Field Work
An idea of the different lithologies present at the site was determined by detailed studies of the stones, particularly those in the southwest circle where there is a good selection of the lithologies.
Summarised in this section are some of the stones and their interesting
and distinctive features. For my full descriptions of each of these stones
see my field notework book.
STANTON DREW STONE CIRCLES
GR: ST 601634
STONE A (No.1 SW circle)
Fig 7. Orange/red clast free stone
STONE B (No. 7 SW circle)
Fig 8. Close up of conglomerate with clearly visible
reaction rims.
STONE C (No. 9 SW circle, better example in Great Circle)
Fig. 9 Possible erosion layer within Butcombe Sandstone.
STONE D (Many examples in Great Circle)
Fig 10 Pitted surface of Limestone stone
STONES OF THE COVE
GR: ST 601634
The Cove is made of three stones. Two of these were probably one piece
as the shapes of the stones indicates they once fitted together, and they
are lithologically identical.
Fig 11. Close up on the surface of the stones of The Cove
CLASTS PROVENANCES within the Dolomitic Conglomerate.
Sandstone: Devonian (Old Red Sandstone).
Chert: Carboniferous (Quartzite Sandstone Group).
Limestones: Carboniferous.
One of the diagnostic features of the silicified Dolomitic Conglomerate
are the reaction rims found on a large number of the clasts. Mostly they
appear as light grey/ pink, extremely hard material that seems to remain
when the inner parts of the clasts erode away. They are found in clasts
from the mm scale to those on tens of centimetres. These are more than
likely to be the result of the metamorphism.
MAP OF THE STANTON DREW
SITE
A map of the Great Circle, the north east and the south west circle
has been produced including alterations to the position of stones. It includes
the lithology of each stone and notable features (see appendix 3). The
original map used was from Morgan 1887.
PROVENANCE
It was necessary to concentrate on locating the silicified conglomerate
as it is the most distinct lithology present at Stanton Drew. The location
of its source could serve to determine the origin of the silicification.
The first promising sample found in the field was in the possible location
for Oaky Hole (GR: 564613). Unfortunately the piece was not in situ but
indicate the correct area may have been found. This area is at the north
eastern end of Harptree Combe. The fact it was not in situ precluded it
from being one of the test samples. In all cases no definite outcrops were
found but the samples were pulled up by fallen trees or in other circumstances
where it was obvious they had not been moved far from their outcrop.
Fig 12 Possible location of Oaky Hole.
The tested samples are summarised in the next location and their localities
recorded on map B and the hand specimen details are summarised in the field
notebook (appendix 2).
GEOCHEMISTRY
The following descriptions are the controls and samples used in the
geochemical analysis.
CONTROL SAMPLES:
CONTROL A: Piece from Megalith.
This sample was not taken directly from the stones by myself. It is
a piece from the University collection. Its notes claim that it is from
a megalith at Stanton Drew collected by J.A. Kemp and suggest that it is
similar to the West Harptree Silicified Conglomerate. It is used as a control
to the possible source samples and to determine if hydrothermal activity
has altered the conglomerate in anyway.
GENERAL FEATURES
MATRIX
CLASTS
CONTROL B: Rhyolite.
As there is reasonable doubt as to the lithology of Stone A on the SW
circle it is necessary to include a control sample of rhyolite to ascertain
whether it is an igneous rock. With the obviously high quantity of quartz
it is most likely to be rhyolitic if it is of igneous origin.
Rhyolite is the volcanic equivalent of a granite. It is essentially
composed of alkali feldspar and quartz. Quartz will probably be present
as tridymite or cristobalite. Augite and hornblende are common minerals
(Klein and Hurlburt, 1993).
CONTROL C: Unsilicified Dolomitic conglomerate.
This is used as a control sample to see what alteration has occurred
between the unsilicified conglomerate to the silicified conglomerate in
terms of overall element content and REE abundance. It is likely that the
movement of hydrothermal liquids will have altered he chemistry of the
conglomerate in someway if it is hydrothermally altered as opposed to contact
baking with no liquid movement involved.
Location: Wells Way Inn car park.
GR: 545 560
GENERAL FEATURES
MATRIX
CLASTS
SAMPLE A
Found in Garrow Bottom
GR: 555553
GENERAL FEATURES
MATRIX
CLASTS
SAMPLE B (Blackened edges)
Sample B on Harptree Combe map
GR: 560556
GENERAL FEATURES
MATRIX
CLASTS
This appears to be the most like the 'rhyolitic' stone seen in the SW circle. Sample B on Harptree Combe map.
GR: 561558
GENERAL FEATURES
MATRIX
CLASTS
SAMPLE D
Found in Harptree Combe
GR:559555
GENERAL FEATURES
Semi Quantitative Analysis
The easiest way to compare the spectrum of the samples is to directly
over lay them and determine whether peaks of abundance of elements match.
Recent analysis carried out on the ICP-MS may have left a contamination
of 74M and 56Ba. This explains the high levels of these two seen in the
semi quantitative analysis. Spectrums of these abundances can be seen in
appendix 4.
Quantitative Analysis
Abundances of rare earth elements in each of the controls and samples
were attained in ppb. 64Gd has been ignored due to it being notoriously
unreliable in ICP-MS work. A calibration curve was introduced. The internal
standards were 44Ru and 75Re. Graphs were plotted for comparison
of the samples and controls and are found in appendix 6.
Notable for geodes like those at Stanton Drew
Notable for reaction rims like those at Stanton Drew
Main Page |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Aims |
Backgrounds |
Methods |
Results and Observations |
Interpretations and Conclusions |
Discussion
Future Work |
References |
Appendices