RESULTS/OBSERVATIONS

Field Work

An idea of the different lithologies present at the site was determined by detailed studies of the stones, particularly those in the southwest circle where there is a good selection of the lithologies.

Summarised in this section are some of the stones and their interesting and distinctive features. For my full descriptions of each of these stones see my field notework book.

STANTON DREW STONE CIRCLES

GR: ST 601634

STONE A (No.1 SW circle)

Stone A

Fig 7. Orange/red clast free stone

STONE B (No. 7 SW circle)

Stone B

Fig 8. Close up of conglomerate with clearly visible reaction rims.

STONE C (No. 9 SW circle, better example in Great Circle)

Stone C

Fig. 9 Possible erosion layer within Butcombe Sandstone.

STONE D (Many examples in Great Circle)

Stone D

Fig 10 Pitted surface of Limestone stone

STONES OF THE COVE

GR: ST 601634

The Cove is made of three stones. Two of these were probably one piece as the shapes of the stones indicates they once fitted together, and they are lithologically identical.

Stones of the Cove

Fig 11. Close up on the surface of the stones of The Cove

CLASTS PROVENANCES within the Dolomitic Conglomerate.

Sandstone: Devonian (Old Red Sandstone).

Chert: Carboniferous (Quartzite Sandstone Group).

Limestones: Carboniferous.

One of the diagnostic features of the silicified Dolomitic Conglomerate are the reaction rims found on a large number of the clasts. Mostly they appear as light grey/ pink, extremely hard material that seems to remain when the inner parts of the clasts erode away. They are found in clasts from the mm scale to those on tens of centimetres. These are more than likely to be the result of the metamorphism.

MAP OF THE STANTON DREW SITE

A map of the Great Circle, the north east and the south west circle has been produced including alterations to the position of stones. It includes the lithology of each stone and notable features (see appendix 3). The original map used was from Morgan 1887.

PROVENANCE

It was necessary to concentrate on locating the silicified conglomerate as it is the most distinct lithology present at Stanton Drew. The location of its source could serve to determine the origin of the silicification.

The first promising sample found in the field was in the possible location for Oaky Hole (GR: 564613). Unfortunately the piece was not in situ but indicate the correct area may have been found. This area is at the north eastern end of Harptree Combe. The fact it was not in situ precluded it from being one of the test samples. In all cases no definite outcrops were found but the samples were pulled up by fallen trees or in other circumstances where it was obvious they had not been moved far from their outcrop.

Oak[e]y Hole

Fig 12 Possible location of Oaky Hole.

The tested samples are summarised in the next location and their localities recorded on map B and the hand specimen details are summarised in the field notebook (appendix 2).

GEOCHEMISTRY

The following descriptions are the controls and samples used in the geochemical analysis.

CONTROL SAMPLES:

CONTROL A: Piece from Megalith.

This sample was not taken directly from the stones by myself. It is a piece from the University collection. Its notes claim that it is from a megalith at Stanton Drew collected by J.A. Kemp and suggest that it is similar to the West Harptree Silicified Conglomerate. It is used as a control to the possible source samples and to determine if hydrothermal activity has altered the conglomerate in anyway.

GENERAL FEATURES

MATRIX

CLASTS


CONTROL B: Rhyolite.

As there is reasonable doubt as to the lithology of Stone A on the SW circle it is necessary to include a control sample of rhyolite to ascertain whether it is an igneous rock. With the obviously high quantity of quartz it is most likely to be rhyolitic if it is of igneous origin.

Rhyolite is the volcanic equivalent of a granite. It is essentially composed of alkali feldspar and quartz. Quartz will probably be present as tridymite or cristobalite. Augite and hornblende are common minerals (Klein and Hurlburt, 1993).

CONTROL C: Unsilicified Dolomitic conglomerate.

This is used as a control sample to see what alteration has occurred between the unsilicified conglomerate to the silicified conglomerate in terms of overall element content and REE abundance. It is likely that the movement of hydrothermal liquids will have altered he chemistry of the conglomerate in someway if it is hydrothermally altered as opposed to contact baking with no liquid movement involved.

Location: Wells Way Inn car park.

GR: 545 560

GENERAL FEATURES

MATRIX

CLASTS


SAMPLE A

Found in Garrow Bottom

GR: 555553

GENERAL FEATURES

MATRIX

CLASTS

SAMPLE B (Blackened edges)

Sample B on Harptree Combe map

GR: 560556

GENERAL FEATURES

MATRIX

CLASTS


(geode containing)

This appears to be the most like the 'rhyolitic' stone seen in the SW circle. Sample B on Harptree Combe map.

GR: 561558

GENERAL FEATURES

MATRIX

CLASTS

Notable for geodes like those at Stanton Drew Notable for reaction rims like those at Stanton Drew

SAMPLE D

Found in Harptree Combe

GR:559555

GENERAL FEATURES

  • Light brown weathered surface.
  • Smooth with signs of weathering.
  • Fractured along planes with some conchoidal fracture.
  • Grey but orange in patches
  • No reaction with acid.
  • Fresh surface is granular, could be identified as igneous though reminiscent of weathering of a sandstone.
  • Very small quartz rich geodes, only a few mm in diameter.
  • Semi Quantitative Analysis

    The easiest way to compare the spectrum of the samples is to directly over lay them and determine whether peaks of abundance of elements match. Recent analysis carried out on the ICP-MS may have left a contamination of 74M and 56Ba. This explains the high levels of these two seen in the semi quantitative analysis. Spectrums of these abundances can be seen in appendix 4.

    Quantitative Analysis

    Abundances of rare earth elements in each of the controls and samples were attained in ppb. 64Gd has been ignored due to it being notoriously unreliable in ICP-MS work. A calibration curve was introduced. The internal standards were 44Ru and 75Re. Graphs were plotted for comparison of the samples and controls and are found in appendix 6.



    Main Page | Abstract | Introduction | Aims | Backgrounds | Methods | Results and Observations | Interpretations and Conclusions | Discussion
    Future Work | References | Appendices